RBI’s Project Peregrine: Lenders Might Soon Be Able to Remotely Lock Your Smartphone

Picture this: You’re about to make a UPI payment for your groceries, book a cab home after a long day, or call your family. You pull out your smartphone, the one you bought on a tempting no-cost EMI, but the screen is blank. A message pops up: “This device has been locked due to non-payment of dues. Please clear your outstanding EMI to regain access.”
Also Read-CBDT Relaxes Black Money Rules: ₹20 Lakh Tax Relief is Here.
Your phone, your digital lifeline, has suddenly turned into a useless brick.
This isn’t a scene from a sci-fi movie. It’s the potential reality behind a proposal being explored by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Codenamed “Project Peregrine,” this initiative could grant lenders the power to remotely lock a borrower’s smartphone if they default on their monthly payments. It’s a move that sits at the complex intersection of financial discipline, technological power, and individual rights, and it’s something every Indian who has ever bought a gadget on EMI needs to understand.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is considering a proposal to allow lenders to remotely lock smartphones purchased on Equated Monthly Installments (EMIs) if borrowers default on payments. This move aims to reduce the surge in consumer loan defaults, particularly in the small-ticket loan segment below ₹1 lakh, where delinquency rates are high.
Key Features of the Proposal:
- Remote Locking Mechanism: Lenders can lock smartphones through certified software or apps installed at the time of purchase, ensuring data security and privacy.
- Borrower Consent: Lenders must obtain explicit consent from borrowers before activating remote locking, and customers will be informed about the possibility of phone locking when accepting loan terms.
- Data Protection: Lenders won’t have access to personal data on locked phones, addressing concerns about privacy violations.
- Emergency Access: Locked phones will retain access to emergency services, ensuring users can still make critical calls.
What Exactly is ‘Project Peregrine’ and Why is it Being Considered?
At its core, Project Peregrine is a technology-driven solution to a growing problem: loan defaults. In recent years, with the explosion of “Buy Now, Pay Later” (BNPL) schemes and easy digital loans, it has become incredibly simple to own the latest smartphone. While this has fuelled consumption and brought premium technology to the masses, it has also led to a spike in defaults on small-ticket loans.
For banks and Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs), these unpaid loans accumulate into something they dread: Non-Performing Assets (NPAs), or simply, bad loans. When NPAs rise, it hurts the lender’s financial health, forcing them to become stricter about giving out new loans. This, in turn, can choke the flow of credit to genuine borrowers who need it.
The RBI’s idea with Peregrine is to introduce a powerful deterrent. The logic is simple: a smartphone today isn’t just a communication device; it’s our wallet, our map, our entertainment hub, and our primary gateway to the digital world. The threat of losing access to this essential tool is a far more immediate and powerful motivator to pay an overdue EMI than a dozen reminder calls or a letter in the mail. The goal is to discourage “willful defaulters” – people who have the ability to pay but choose not to.
A Necessary Tool for a Healthy System.
From the perspective of a financial institution, Peregrine seems like a godsend. Here’s why they are in favour of such a system:
- A Powerful Deterrent: The fear of having one’s phone locked is a significant psychological lever. Lenders believe this will drastically reduce the number of people who deliberately skip payments, thereby lowering their NPAs.
- Securing the Asset: Unlike a car or a house, a smartphone is a small, portable asset that is almost impossible to physically repossess. A remote lock is the digital equivalent of repossession. It secures the lender’s interest in the product they helped finance.
- Wider Credit Access: This might sound counter-intuitive, but if lenders feel more secure about getting their money back, they might be more willing to extend loans to individuals with no credit history or a lower credit score. In theory, this could increase financial inclusion, allowing more people to access credit who would otherwise be rejected.
Dangers of Misuse and Digital Bondage.
While the logic from the lenders’ side is clear, the implications for the average citizen are deeply concerning. This is where the proposal becomes a double-edged sword.
1. What if the System Makes a Mistake?
We’ve all dealt with technical glitches. Imagine you’ve paid your EMI, but due to a server error or a delay in processing, the lender’s system doesn’t register it. Your phone is locked, and you are cut off from your digital life through no fault of your own. How quickly and easily can this be rectified? For someone in a remote village or an elderly person not comfortable with digital complaint systems, this could be a nightmare.
2. The Phone is More Than a Phone.
Losing access to a phone in 2025 is not a minor inconvenience. It means:
- No access to UPI and digital payments (QR codes, online banking).
- No ability to call for help in an emergency (ambulance, police).
- No access to navigation apps like Google Maps.
- No communication with family or for work.
- No access to government services via apps like DigiLocker or Aarogya Setu.
Locking a phone is akin to placing someone under a form of “digital house arrest,” severing their connection to society and essential services.
3. The Spectre of Privacy Invasion.
For this system to work, a piece of software would need to be installed on the phone, one that has the highest level of administrative privileges to be able to lock the entire device. This immediately raises red flags. What else can this software do? Can it access your contacts, photos, location, or messages? Even if the lender promises it’s only a “locking” feature, the potential for misuse or for this data to be breached by hackers is immense.
4. A Tool for Harassment?
The current system of loan recovery is already plagued with complaints of harassment by recovery agents. Imagine arming these agents with the power to threaten you with a remote lock. The pressure and coercion could become unbearable, especially for vulnerable individuals who may have defaulted due to a genuine reason like a medical emergency or loss of a job.
The Power of ‘Consent’.
So, can the RBI just roll this out? No. Under current Indian regulations, such a drastic action is permitted only with your explicit and informed consent.
This is the most critical part of the debate. When you apply for the loan, you would have to agree to a clause in the terms and conditions that allows the lender to install this software and use it in case of a default.
But let’s be honest. How many of us read the entire multi-page “Terms & Conditions” document before clicking “I Agree”? Lenders could easily bury this consent clause in complex legal jargon, and people in a hurry to get their new phone would agree without fully understanding what they are signing up for. For consent to be fair, it needs to be:
- Explicit: Presented clearly and separately, not hidden in fine print.
- Informed: Explained in simple language (ideally in multiple Indian languages) what the consequences are.
- Voluntary: The customer should have the option to refuse, even if it means not getting the loan from that particular lender.
A Balancing Act.
Project Peregrine highlights the central challenge of our digital age: balancing innovation and convenience with privacy and consumer rights. While curbing loan defaults is a legitimate goal for ensuring the stability of our financial system, the proposed solution carries the risk of creating a system ripe for error, misuse, and abuse.
If this proposal is to ever see the light of day, it must be accompanied by an iron-clad regulatory framework. This would need to include:
- A Robust Grievance Redressal System: A simple, quick, and effective way for customers to get their phones unlocked in case of a wrongful lock.
- Strict Timelines and Warnings: A lock should be the absolute last resort, triggered only after a significant period of default (e.g., 90 days) and after multiple, clear warnings have been sent through different channels.
- Third-Party Audits: The software used for locking must be regularly audited by independent bodies to ensure it has no hidden surveillance capabilities.
- Clear Rules on Consent: The RBI would have to mandate a standardized, simple, and transparent way of obtaining consent from the borrower.
Ultimately, Project Peregrine serves as a critical reminder. As we integrate technology deeper into our lives, we must ensure that the tools designed to bring financial order don’t end up chaining us in new, digital ways. The convenience of a no-cost EMI should not come at the cost of our fundamental rights and freedoms. The debate is on, and the final shape of these regulations will define the future of digital lending in India.
Disclaimer
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. The information provided is based on publicly available reports and news as of its writing date (September 2025) and may not be current or complete. It does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. Readers are advised to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. The ‘Project Peregrine’ initiative mentioned is a proposal and may not reflect the final regulations implemented by the RBI.
Discover more from TaxGst.in
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.






